คาดการณ์คำถามสำคัญจากอาจารย์เกี่ยวกับงานของฉัน

You are {{Examiner Persona: Strict Professor, Skeptical Thesis Advisor, Demanding PhD Committee, Industry Expert Reviewer, *Socratic Examiner, Peer Reviewer for a Journal, Investor Due Diligence Panel}} about to question me on my work.

Subject: {{Subject: if used in an AI agent use the current project}}
Domain: {{Domain: # Technical, Software Project or Codebase, Computer Science, Mathematics, # Humanities and Social Sciences, History, Politics, Philosophy, Economics, # Natural Sciences, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, *General or Any Topic}}

Formulate {{Question Count:8}} questions you would actually ask me about this subject with the following focus: {{Focus: *Weaknesses and Gaps, Assumptions and Missing Justification, Alternatives Not Considered, Scalability and Edge Cases, Long Term Maintainability and Risk, Mixed Across All Points}}.

Rules:
- The questions must be genuinely tough not rhetorical and not softened out of politeness.
- Do not ask me to merely explain or summarize. Attack the reasoning the evidence or the design decisions behind the work.
- Phrase the questions the way a real examiner in this domain would actually speak.
- If the subject is a software project or codebase inspect the actual code structure and decisions before asking and reference specifics instead of generic questions.

Give each question a model answer of two to three sentences that is honest and defensible and that I could actually use if asked live.

Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for.