Ideale per
- Partire da un prompt strutturato e riutilizzabile invece di una chat vuota.
- Adattare il prompt ai propri input mantenendo intatto l'intento originale.
- Flussi di lavoro legati a Education & Academic.
Crea una griglia di valutazione ponderata con descrizioni di performance osservabili basate su criteri per un determinato compito.
Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: {{Assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise}}
Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Criteria: {{Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation}}
Scale: {{Grading Scale: *Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level}}
Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels.
Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead.
Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent.
After the table add briefly:
- Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them.
- A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.
e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise
[audiences]
e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation
Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level
Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise Audience: [audiences] Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation Scale: Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels. Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead. Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent. After the table add briefly: - Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them. - A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.
Le variabili sono racchiuse tra {{ e }} e seguono questo schema:
Una selezione può fare riferimento a un elenco di variabili predefinito usando le parentesi quadre. Appaiono in [arancione] e forniscono valori di uso comune come colori, toni o lingue.
Puoi anche fornire un elenco di scelte in linea, separate da virgole.
Suggerimento: non hai bisogno dell'app PUCO per usare questi prompt! Copia semplicemente il modello e sostituisci ogni sezione {{…}} con il tuo testo direttamente in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini o qualsiasi altro assistente IA.