Idéal pour
- Partir d'un prompt structuré et réutilisable plutôt que d'une conversation vierge.
- Adapter le prompt à vos propres données tout en conservant l'intention d'origine.
- Les workflows liés à Education & Academic.
Génère des questions inconfortables qui attaquent les prémisses, qu’un public sceptique pourrait poser sur un sujet de cours, avec une réponse honnête pour chacune.
You are an experienced lecturer preparing a lesson.
Lesson topic: {{Lesson Topic: e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework}}
Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Formulate {{Question Count:8}} questions that skeptical alert students from this audience might ask about this topic with the following focus: {{Focus: *Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All, Technical Alternatives - Why Not Do It Differently, Effort Versus Benefit - Is It Worth It, Scope - When Does This Stop Applying, Mixed Across All Points}}.
Rules:
- The questions must be genuinely uncomfortable not rhetorical and not asked in a benevolent way.
- No comprehension questions about the material. The questions attack the premise.
- Phrase them the way students actually talk not in textbook language.
Give each question an answer of two to three sentences that is honest without sugarcoating and states plainly where the criticism is justified.
Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for if I only knew the material.
e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework
[audiences]
8
Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All, Technical Alternatives - Why Not Do It Differently, Effort Versus Benefit - Is It Worth It, Scope - When Does This Stop Applying, Mixed Across All Points
You are an experienced lecturer preparing a lesson. Lesson topic: e.g. SwiftUI's Observation Framework Audience: [audiences] Formulate 8 questions that skeptical alert students from this audience might ask about this topic with the following focus: Relevance - Why Should I Learn This at All. Rules: - The questions must be genuinely uncomfortable not rhetorical and not asked in a benevolent way. - No comprehension questions about the material. The questions attack the premise. - Phrase them the way students actually talk not in textbook language. Give each question an answer of two to three sentences that is honest without sugarcoating and states plainly where the criticism is justified. Mark at the end the two questions I would be worst prepared for if I only knew the material.
Les variables sont entourées de {{ et }} et suivent ce modèle :
Une sélection peut référencer une liste de variables prédéfinie à l'aide de crochets. Elles apparaissent en [orange] et fournissent des valeurs courantes comme des couleurs, des tons ou des langues.
Vous pouvez aussi fournir une liste de choix en ligne, séparés par des virgules.
Astuce : vous n'avez pas besoin de l'application PUCO pour utiliser ces prompts ! Copiez simplement le modèle et remplacez chaque section {{…}} par votre propre texte directement dans ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini ou tout autre assistant IA.