Idéal pour
- Partir d'un prompt structuré et réutilisable plutôt que d'une conversation vierge.
- Adapter le prompt à vos propres données tout en conservant l'intention d'origine.
- Les workflows liés à Education & Academic.
Analyse le support pédagogique pour repérer les angles morts, comme les hypothèses implicites ou les consignes floues, et renvoie des recommandations priorisées et exploitables.
Here is my teaching material:
{{Teaching Material: e.g. Paste the Slide or Handout Text Here}}
Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Review the material from the perspective of a well meaning but incorruptible colleague with the following focus: {{Review Focus: *Assumed Prior Knowledge, Clarity of Task Instructions and Wording, Structure and Pacing of the Lesson, Time Budget - Does the Material Fit the Lesson, Everything Together}}.
Output the findings as a numbered list. Each finding must name:
- The location such as the slide the section or a quote of the affected line.
- What exactly the problem is.
- The point at which students would disengage because of it.
- A concrete suggestion for how to change it.
Sort the findings by severity not by their order in the document.
Pay particular attention to prior knowledge that is silently assumed without ever being named.
Do not include praise or a summary of strengths. If a section is fine do not mention it.
Name at the end the single change that would make the biggest difference.
e.g. Paste the Slide or Handout Text Here
[audiences]
Assumed Prior Knowledge, Clarity of Task Instructions and Wording, Structure and Pacing of the Lesson, Time Budget - Does the Material Fit the Lesson, Everything Together
Here is my teaching material: e.g. Paste the Slide or Handout Text Here Audience: [audiences] Review the material from the perspective of a well meaning but incorruptible colleague with the following focus: Assumed Prior Knowledge. Output the findings as a numbered list. Each finding must name: - The location such as the slide the section or a quote of the affected line. - What exactly the problem is. - The point at which students would disengage because of it. - A concrete suggestion for how to change it. Sort the findings by severity not by their order in the document. Pay particular attention to prior knowledge that is silently assumed without ever being named. Do not include praise or a summary of strengths. If a section is fine do not mention it. Name at the end the single change that would make the biggest difference.
Les variables sont entourées de {{ et }} et suivent ce modèle :
Une sélection peut référencer une liste de variables prédéfinie à l'aide de crochets. Elles apparaissent en [orange] et fournissent des valeurs courantes comme des couleurs, des tons ou des langues.
Vous pouvez aussi fournir une liste de choix en ligne, séparés par des virgules.
Astuce : vous n'avez pas besoin de l'application PUCO pour utiliser ces prompts ! Copiez simplement le modèle et remplacez chaque section {{…}} par votre propre texte directement dans ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini ou tout autre assistant IA.