Ideal para
- Empezar desde un prompt estructurado y reutilizable en lugar de un chat en blanco.
- Adaptar el prompt a tus propios datos manteniendo intacta la intención original.
- Flujos de trabajo relacionados con Education & Academic.
Generador de rúbricas de evaluación para tareas
Rellenar este promptCrea una rúbrica de evaluación ponderada con descripciones de desempeño observables basadas en criterios para una tarea dada.
Plantilla de prompt
Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: {{Assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise}}
Audience: {{Audience:[audiences]}}
Criteria: {{Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation}}
Scale: {{Grading Scale: *Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level}}
Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels.
Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead.
Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent.
After the table add briefly:
- Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them.
- A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.
Guía del prompt
Cómo usarlo
- Copia la plantilla de prompt completa.
- Sustituye cada variable por tu propio contexto o elige una de las opciones sugeridas.
- Pega el prompt completado en ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini u otro asistente de IA.
Variables de este prompt
Assignment
e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise
Audience
Lista predefinida
[audiences]
Criteria
e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation
Grading Scale
Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing, Four Levels Including Not Met, Point Scale 0 to 100 With Ranges per Level
Ejemplo de partida
Create a grading rubric for the following assignment: e.g. A SwiftUI View Model Refactoring Exercise Audience: [audiences] Criteria: e.g. Code Quality and Architecture and Testing and Documentation Scale: Three Levels - Excellent Meets Developing Output the rubric as a table. Rows are the criteria and columns are the performance levels. Each cell contains two sentences that describe concretely and observably how this level of performance looks in the submitted artifact. Do not use vague phrases such as good code quality cleanly implemented or appropriate. Use verifiable characteristics instead. Weight the criteria and state the weighting in percent. After the table add briefly: - Three cases where the classification is typically contentious and how I decide them. - A five sentence short version of the rubric to give students before they start their submission.
Cómo funcionan las variables
Sintaxis de variables
Las variables van entre {{ y }} y siguen este patrón:
{{variable name: option1, option2, option3 }}
Variables predefinidas
Una selección puede hacer referencia a una lista de variables predefinida usando corchetes. Aparecen en [naranja] y proporcionan valores de uso común como colores, tonos o idiomas.
{{Tone: [tones] }}
Listas de selección personalizadas
También puedes proporcionar una lista de opciones en línea, separadas por comas.
{{Format: bullet points, paragraphs, numbered list }}
Consejo: ¡no necesitas la app PUCO para usar estos prompts! Solo copia la plantilla y sustituye cada sección {{…}} por tu propio texto directamente en ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini o cualquier otro asistente de IA.